PPA Analysis Methodologies

Module Overview

Performance, Power, and Area (PPA) analysis is fundamental to hardware architecture decisions, especially for AI accelerators where efficiency is paramount. This module teaches the systematic methodologies used at leading technology companies to evaluate and optimize hardware designs.

Why PPA Analysis Matters

In AI hardware design, engineers constantly face trade-offs:

Performance vs Power: Higher performance often means higher power consumption
Performance vs Area: More parallel units increase performance but consume more die area
Power vs Area: Power-saving techniques (voltage islands, clock gating) require additional area
Cost constraints: Silicon cost scales with area, thermal design cost scales with power

Learning Path

1. Performance Analysis Fundamentals

Latency vs Throughput: Different optimization targets for different workloads
Utilization metrics: Computing actual vs theoretical peak performance
Bottleneck analysis: Identifying limiting factors in complex pipelines
Scaling analysis: Performance behavior with increased resources

2. Power Modeling Techniques

Dynamic power: Switching activity, capacitive load, voltage scaling
Static power: Leakage current, process variation, temperature effects
Power measurement: On-chip sensors, external measurement, estimation tools
Power optimization: Clock gating, power islands, dynamic voltage scaling

3. Area Estimation Methods

Gate-level area: Standard cell area, routing overhead, metal layers
Memory area: SRAM compiler models, custom memory design
Packaging considerations: Die size limits, yield curves, cost models
Technology scaling: Process node impact on area efficiency

4. Integrated PPA Optimization

Multi-objective optimization: Pareto frontier analysis
Design space exploration: Automated search algorithms
Sensitivity analysis: Impact of parameter variations
Constraint satisfaction: Meeting multiple design targets simultaneously

Key Technical Concepts

Performance Modeling Framework

AI Accelerator Performance Model:
 
Peak Performance = Units × Clock × Utilization × Efficiency
 
Where:
- Units: Number of parallel execution units (MAC, Tensor Cores)
- Clock: Operating frequency (limited by critical path, power)
- Utilization: Fraction of time units are active (workload dependent)
- Efficiency: Actual vs theoretical throughput (pipeline, memory)
 
Example for Matrix Multiplication:
TOPS = (MAC_Units × Clock_GHz × 2_ops_per_MAC × Utilization) / 1000
 
Bottleneck Analysis:
- Compute-bound: Limited by execution units
- Memory-bound: Limited by bandwidth or latency
- Control-bound: Limited by instruction dispatch/scheduling

Power Analysis Framework

Total Power = Dynamic Power + Static Power
 
Dynamic Power = α × C × V² × f
- α: switching activity factor (0-1)
- C: total capacitance
- V: supply voltage  
- f: clock frequency
 
Static Power = V × I_leakage
- Temperature dependent
- Process variation sensitive
- Dominates at advanced nodes
 
<pre className="ascii-diagram">
Power Optimization Techniques:
┌─────────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┐
│ Technique       │ Power Save  │ Area Cost   │
├─────────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┤
│ Clock Gating    │ 20-40%      │ 5-10%       │
│ Power Gating    │ 50-90%      │ 10-15%      │
│ DVFS            │ 30-70%      │ 15-25%      │
│ Near Threshold  │ 10x-100x    │ 2x-5x area  │
└─────────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
</pre>
 
### Area Modeling

Total Area = Logic + Memory + Interconnect + Overhead

Logic Area:

Standard cells: NAND, NOR, flip-flops, complex gates
Custom cells: MAC units, adders, multipliers
Synthesis efficiency: RTL coding style impact

Memory Area:

SRAM compilers: Generated memory models
Custom memory: Specialized storage (weight caches, scratchpads)
Memory hierarchy: L1, L2, on-chip vs off-chip trade-offs

Interconnect:

Metal layers: Local routing, global routing, power grid
NoC (Network-on-Chip): Routers, links, buffers
I/O pads: High-speed serdes, power delivery

Technology Scaling Impact: 28nm → 16nm: ~50% area reduction 16nm → 7nm: ~65% area reduction
7nm → 5nm: ~85% area reduction

 
## Practical Exercises
 
### Exercise 1: GPU Tensor Core PPA Analysis
Analyze modern datacenter GPU Tensor Core design:
- Calculate theoretical peak performance (TOPS)
- Estimate power consumption at different utilization rates
- Analyze area breakdown (compute vs memory vs control)
- Compare with alternative designs (wider vs deeper)
 
### Exercise 2: Custom AI Accelerator Design Space Exploration
Design a mobile inference accelerator:
- Define performance targets (inferences/second)
- Set power budget (mobile thermal constraints)
- Optimize for area efficiency (cost targets)
- Explore architectural alternatives (systolic vs dataflow)
 
### Exercise 3: Memory Hierarchy PPA Optimization
Design memory hierarchy for transformer inference:
- Analyze access patterns for attention computation
- Size caches for different model sizes (7B, 70B parameters)
- Trade off SRAM area vs DRAM bandwidth
- Optimize for both training and inference workloads
 
### Exercise 4: Multi-Node System PPA Analysis
Analyze distributed training system:
- Model communication power overhead
- Calculate interconnect area requirements  
- Optimize for performance/power at system level
- Consider packaging and cooling constraints
 
## Industry PPA Methodologies
 
### Datacenter GPU Architecture Development Process

Industry-Standard PPA Analysis Flow:

Workload Analysis
- Characterize target AI workloads
- Identify bottlenecks and optimization opportunities
Architecture Exploration
- Generate multiple design alternatives
- Early PPA estimation using models
Detailed Design
- RTL development and verification
- Accurate power and area analysis
Silicon Validation
- Measure actual PPA on hardware
- Validate models and improve accuracy

 
### TPU Design Philosophy

TPU PPA Optimization Strategy:

Performance: Maximize TOPS/$ for datacenter workloads
Power: Optimize for datacenter power delivery constraints
Area: Balance die size with packaging and yield costs

Key Decisions:

Large systolic arrays (high throughput, area efficient)
Simplified control logic (power efficient)
Custom interconnect (bandwidth optimized)
Mixed precision support (flexibility vs complexity)

 
### Mobile Neural Engine Approach

Mobile AI PPA Constraints:

Performance: Real-time inference requirements
Power: Battery life, thermal management
Area: SoC area budget limitations

Optimization Techniques:

Ultra-low power design techniques
Aggressive clock gating and power gating
Custom memory hierarchy for common models
Co-design with software stack for efficiency

 
## Advanced Topics
 
### Machine Learning for PPA Optimization
- **Predictive modeling**: ML models for early PPA estimation
- **Design space exploration**: RL-based architecture search
- **Pareto frontier prediction**: Multi-objective optimization using ML
- **Process variation modeling**: Statistical analysis and robust design
 
### System-Level PPA Analysis
- **Packaging constraints**: Thermal, electrical, mechanical limits
- **Cooling solutions**: Air, liquid, immersion cooling trade-offs  
- **Power delivery**: Voltage regulator efficiency, power grid design
- **Yield optimization**: Design for manufacturing, redundancy strategies
 
### Future Technology Considerations
- **Advanced process nodes**: 3nm, 2nm node characteristics
- **3D integration**: Through-silicon vias, die stacking
- **Novel memory**: Processing-in-memory, memristive devices
- **Optical interconnect**: Silicon photonics integration
 
## Assessment Framework
 
### Technical Competency
- Ability to build accurate performance models
- Understanding of power estimation techniques  
- Knowledge of area optimization strategies
- Integration of PPA constraints in design decisions
 
### Analytical Skills
- Design space exploration methodologies
- Trade-off analysis and optimization
- Statistical analysis of design variations
- Cost modeling and economic analysis
 
### Communication Skills
- Clear presentation of PPA analysis results
- Justification of architectural decisions
- Technical writing for design documentation
- Collaboration with cross-functional teams
 
## Tools and Methodologies
 
### Industry-Standard Tools
- **Synopsys**: PrimePower, PTPX for power analysis
- **Cadence**: Innovus for place and route, area analysis
- **Mentor**: Calibre for design rule checking, yield analysis
- **Custom tools**: Internal company-specific analysis frameworks
 
### Open Source Alternatives
- **CACTI**: Cache and memory area/power modeling
- **McPAT**: Processor power modeling framework
- **OpenRAM**: SRAM compiler for area estimation
- **SCALE-Sim**: Systolic array accelerator simulator
 
---
 
This module provides the quantitative analysis skills essential for hardware architecture roles, where data-driven decision making and rigorous PPA analysis guide multi-million dollar design investments.

PPA Analysis Methodologies

Part of Learning Tracks

Deep Learning Performance Architect Learning Track

PPA Analysis Methodologies

Module Overview

Why PPA Analysis Matters

Learning Path

1. Performance Analysis Fundamentals

2. Power Modeling Techniques

3. Area Estimation Methods

4. Integrated PPA Optimization

Key Technical Concepts

Performance Modeling Framework

Power Analysis Framework

Related Modules

AI Workload Analysis & Benchmarking

Modeling & Simulation

Power & Thermal Awareness — From Activity to perf/W